<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The End</title>
	<link>http://www.emmasinclair.com/blog/2005/09/27/the-end/</link>
	<description>Author of Sizzling Hot Romance</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 07:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Danica</title>
		<link>http://www.emmasinclair.com/blog/2005/09/27/the-end/#comment-406</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 05:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emmasinclair.com/blog/2005/09/27/the-end/#comment-406</guid>
					<description>Congrats!!

Well, I'm a romance purist, so "for now" usually pisses me off.  I want the whole "ever after".  Although I do allow room as long as the "for now" is headed toward "ever after".  With one immortal, and one not, though, it doesn't work for me.  The one that's not will end up dying, and where does that leave the immortal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats!!</p>
<p>Well, I&#8217;m a romance purist, so &#8220;for now&#8221; usually pisses me off.  I want the whole &#8220;ever after&#8221;.  Although I do allow room as long as the &#8220;for now&#8221; is headed toward &#8220;ever after&#8221;.  With one immortal, and one not, though, it doesn&#8217;t work for me.  The one that&#8217;s not will end up dying, and where does that leave the immortal?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Emma</title>
		<link>http://www.emmasinclair.com/blog/2005/09/27/the-end/#comment-405</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emmasinclair.com/blog/2005/09/27/the-end/#comment-405</guid>
					<description>See Tess, that makes sense to me - that there could eventually be a HEA.  But if one of the parties has a significantly shorter life span than the other, that kind of kills any hope there is for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See Tess, that makes sense to me - that there could eventually be a HEA.  But if one of the parties has a significantly shorter life span than the other, that kind of kills any hope there is for that.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tess Harrison</title>
		<link>http://www.emmasinclair.com/blog/2005/09/27/the-end/#comment-404</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 23:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emmasinclair.com/blog/2005/09/27/the-end/#comment-404</guid>
					<description>First congrats!  Great job on finishing.  On the Happy For Now vs. Happy Ever After. . .  If I feel that the Happy For Now works for the story I'm ok with it.  That's actually how I end my second book in my series.  The heroine isn't ready for that ever after part.  Yet.  But in my mind it's there for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First congrats!  Great job on finishing.  On the Happy For Now vs. Happy Ever After. . .  If I feel that the Happy For Now works for the story I&#8217;m ok with it.  That&#8217;s actually how I end my second book in my series.  The heroine isn&#8217;t ready for that ever after part.  Yet.  But in my mind it&#8217;s there for them.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kendra Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.emmasinclair.com/blog/2005/09/27/the-end/#comment-403</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 19:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emmasinclair.com/blog/2005/09/27/the-end/#comment-403</guid>
					<description>YAY Emma!!!  Go girl.  Send some of that motivation my way ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YAY Emma!!!  Go girl.  Send some of that motivation my way ;)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
